A significant decision has been made in the ongoing legal battle over Prince Harry’s U.S. visa records. A federal judge has ruled that while certain documents related to the Duke of Sussex’s immigration status can be released, others will remain sealed due to privacy concerns. The ruling marks a pivotal moment in the dispute over whether Harry’s visa application should be made public.
The case stems from a lawsuit filed by The Heritage Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based conservative think tank, which has challenged the approval of Harry’s visa following his 2020 move to the United States. The organization argues that Harry’s admissions in Spare—where he spoke openly about using drugs raise questions about whether he disclosed this information during the visa application process.
Earlier attempts by the foundation to obtain the records through a Freedom of Information Act request were denied by the Department of Homeland Security, with officials citing privacy protections. However, after continued legal pressure, Judge Carl Nichols has now agreed to allow the release of certain materials while keeping one document confidential due to its sensitive nature. The redacted materials are expected to be submitted to the court by March 6.
Trump’s Past Comments on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
Although this lawsuit is not tied to the White House, former President Donald Trump has previously shared strong opinions about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Speaking at the 2024 Conservative Political Action Conference, Trump stated, “I wouldn’t protect [Harry]. He betrayed the Queen. That’s unforgivable. He would be on his own if it was down to me.” He also criticized the Biden administration, arguing that they had been “too gracious” toward Harry since his relocation to the U.S.
Trump has expressed his disapproval of the couple’s departure from royal duties and their public statements about the British monarchy. However, immigration matters remain within the jurisdiction of the courts and federal agencies.
Legal Battle Over Transparency and Immigration Policy
The Heritage Foundation, led by Nile Gardiner, continues to advocate for the full release of Harry’s immigration records, framing the case as a matter of immigration transparency. Gardiner stated, “Donald Trump is ushering in a new era of strict border control enforcement, and you know, Prince Harry should be held fully to account as he has admitted to extensive illegal drug use.” He added, “My firm expectation is that action will be taken.”
With the latest court decision allowing partial disclosure, the case remains a focal point in ongoing discussions about privacy, immigration law, and high-profile figures residing in the U.S. As the legal process unfolds, further details may emerge about Harry’s visa application and the broader implications of the ruling.